In the case, the applicant successfully complained that the judicial verification of the reasonableness of his detention in the appellate instance did not meet the urgency criterion. There has been a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2014, the applicant was assisted in preparing the аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the applicant complained that the judicial verification of the reasonableness of his detention in the appellate instance did not meet the criterion of urgency.
On 13 June 2017, on a complaint lodged by the applicant, the Court unanimously held that in the present case the Government violated the requirement of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (right to liberty and security of person) and ordered the respondent State to pay the applicant 2,250 euros compensation for non-pecuniary damage.
Decision of the ECHR of June 13, 2017 in the case of Chayka v. Russia (аpplication No. 37042/14).