In the case, the complaint on the cancellation of the judgment in favor of the applicant was successfully considered in view of the newly discovered circumstances. There has been a violation of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2004, the applicant was assisted in the preparation of the аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was also communicated to the Russian Federation.
In her complaint, the applicant complained of violations of the right to property and the principle of legal certainty because of the cancellation of the judicial decision rendered in her favor due to newly discovered circumstances.
On 13 June 2017, on a complaint lodged by the applicant, the Court unanimously held that in this case the Government violated the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention (the right to a fair trial), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (right to property protection), and obliged the respondent State to pay the applicant EUR 2,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
The ECHR judgment of 13 June 2017 in the case of Kravchenko v. The Russian Federation (аpplication No. 23137/04).