The case successfully examined the applicant's complaint that he was not provided with adequate medical care during the period of detention and for lack of effective remedies that the detention measure was not substantiated and the complaint about the detention order was not considered within a reasonable time. The case involved violations of the requirements of Article 3 and Article 5, paragraphs 3 and 4, of Article 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights.
In 2011, the applicant was assisted in preparing the аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the complainant, suffering from a number of diseases (including diabetes mellitus, chronic pancreatitis), complained that he was not provided with adequate medical care during the period of detention, as well as for the lack of effective remedies in this regard, and that the measure of imprisonment in the form of detention was not substantiated, and the complaint about the decision on his detention was not examined within a reasonable time.
On 25 July 2017, on the application lodged by the applicant, the Court unanimously held that in this case the Government violated the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention (prohibition of torture), Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention (right to liberty and security of the person), Article 13 Of the Convention (the right to an effective domestic remedy) and ordered the respondent State to pay the applicant EUR 19,500 in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
ECHR Judgment of July 25, 2017 in the case "Yankovskiy v. Russia (" Yankovskiy v. Russia) "(аpplication No. 24051/11).