The case successfully examined the applicant's complaint that he was ill-treated by law enforcement officers and the lack of an effective investigation of this circumstance, on the illegality of detention in connection with the absence of any fixation of the fact of his detention. The case involved violations of the requirements of Article 3 and subparagraph (c) of paragraph 3 of Article 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights.
In 2013, the applicant was assisted in preparing the аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the applicant complained that he had been ill-treated by law enforcement officials and that there was no effective investigation of this circumstance. The applicant also complained about the unlawfulness of detention in connection with the absence of any fixation of the fact of his detention.
On October 3, 2017, on a complaint lodged by the applicant, the Court unanimously held that in this case the Government violated the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention (prohibition of torture) in its substantive and procedural aspects, Article 5 § 1 (c) liberty and security of the person), and obliged the respondent State to pay the applicant 26,000 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
The ECHR judgment of 03 October 2017 in the case of Kramarenko v. Russia (аpplication No. 26107/13).