The ECHR found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms with respect to all the applicants, Article 13, Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fu

Заголовок: The ECHR found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Сведения: 2018-08-02 06:15:37

The ECHR judgment of 8 February 2018 in the case of Puzrina and Others v. The Russian Federation (applications N 5855/09, 46330/10, 70881/13, 6216/14, 53395/15, 33531/16, 34065 / 16, 42878/16, 50716/16 and 64175/16).

The case successfully examined the applicants' complaints about inhuman conditions of detention during the transfer, some applicants also complained that they did not have an effective remedy in this regard, the excessive length of pre-trial detention and the length of the judicial review of the reasonableness of their detention under guards. The case involved a violation of the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms with respect to all the applicants, Article 13, paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms with respect to certain applicants.

In 2009, 2010, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017, the applicants were assisted in the preparation of applications. Subsequently, the applications were merged and communicated to the Russian Federation.

In their complaints, the applicants (10 persons) complained of inhuman conditions of detention during the transfer. Individual applicants also complained that they did not have an effective remedy in this regard, the excessive length of pre-trial detention and the length of the judicial review of the reasonableness of their detention.

On 8 February 2018, on the complaints submitted by the applicants, the Court unanimously held that in this case the Government violated the requirement of Article 3 of the Convention (prohibition of torture) against all applicants, the requirement of Article 13 of the Convention (right to an effective remedy), the requirements of paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 5 of the Convention (right to liberty and security of person) against individual applicants, and ordered the respondent State to pay the applicants 11 700 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.

 

Добавить комментарий

Защитный код
Обновить

© 2011-2018 Юридическая помощь в составлении жалоб в Европейский суд по правам человека. Юрист (представитель) ЕСПЧ.