The ECHR judgment of 8 March 2018 in the case of Zalizko v. The Russian Federation (application No. 26503/07).
The applicant successfully complained of the applicant's failure to comply with the decisions of the courts of the Russian Federation against the unitary enterprise, the applicant also pointed out that she did not have an effective remedy in this regard. The case involved a violation of the requirements of Article 6, paragraph 1, Article 13 of the Convention of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
In 2007, the applicant was assisted in the preparation of the application. Subsequently, the application was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In her complaints, the applicant complained about non-compliance with the decisions of the courts of the Russian Federation against the unitary enterprise. The applicant also pointed out that she did not have an effective remedy in this regard.
On 8 March 2018, on a complaint lodged by the applicant, the Court unanimously held that in this case the Government violated the requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (the right to a fair trial), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (protection of property), Article 13 of the Convention (right to an effective remedy) and ordered the respondent State to pay the applicant 7,832 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.