The ECHR judgment of November 26, 2019 in the case of Kravchuk v. The Russian Federation (application N 10899/12).
In 2012, the applicant was assisted in preparing the application. Subsequently, the application was communicated to the Russian Federation.
The case has successfully examined the application that the amount of compensation for the withdrawal in favor of the state of the land plot the applicant was the owner of was significantly lower than its real value, and also that the courts of the respondent state did not allow him to provide evidence regarding the justification of his claims, and the legislation of the Russian Federation did not allow him to dispute the amount of compensation offered to him. The case has violated Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (property right).
In his application, the applicant complained that the amount of compensation for the withdrawal in favor of the state of the land plot of which he was the owner was significantly lower than its real value, as well as that the courts of the respondent Government did not allow him to provide evidence regarding the justification for his requirements, and the legislation of the Russian Federation did not allow him to dispute the amount of compensation offered to him.
On November 26, 2019, in an application lodged by the applicant, the Court unanimously ruled that in the present case the Russian authorities violated the requirements of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (property right) and ordered the respondent Government to pay the applicant 3,500 euros in quality compensation for non-pecuniary damage.