The ECHR judgment of September 17, 2019 in the case of Negruta v. The Republic of Moldova and the Russian Federation (application No. 3445/13).
In 2013, the applicant was assisted in preparing the application. Subsequently, the application was communicated to the Republic of Moldova and the Russian Federation.
In the case, the application on the conditions of the applicant’s detention, the unlawfulness of the detention and the unlawfulness of the removal of the vehicle from the applicant was successfully examined. The case violated article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (prohibition of torture), article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention (right to liberty and security of person), article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (right to protect property).
In his application, the applicant complained about the conditions of his detention, the unlawfulness of his detention and the unlawfulness of the seizure of his vehicle.
On September 17, 2019, on an application filed by the applicant, the European Court unanimously ruled that the Moldovan authorities violated the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention (prohibition of torture), Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (right to liberty and security of person), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (right to protect property) and that the authorities of the Russian Federation violated the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention, paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Convention, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
On September 17, 2019, in an application filed by the applicant, the European Court unanimously decided that the authorities of the Republic of Moldova should pay the applicant EUR 5,600 in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 700 in respect of costs and expenses, and the Russian authorities - EUR 9,500 in in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 1,200 euros in respect of costs and expenses.