The case has successfully examined the applicants' complaints about the non-enforcement of court decisions and the lack of effective remedies in this regard. The case violated the requirements of paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the Convention (the right to a fair trial), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (protection of property), there is no need to consider a complaint of violation of Article 13 of the Convention (the right to an effective remedy).
In 2006, 2011, 2012 and 2014, complainants were assisted in preparing applications. Subsequently, the applications were merged and communicated to the Russian Federation.
In their complaints, the applicants (four people) complained about the non-enforcement of court decisions and the lack of effective remedies in this regard.
On 14 June 2018, the European Court unanimously ruled that in the present case the authorities violated the requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (right to a fair trial), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (protection of property), there is no need to consider a complaint of a violation of Article 13 of the Convention (the right to an effective remedy), and ordered the respondent State to pay the applicants EUR 12,000 as fair compensation. The applicants were awarded various amounts from 0 to 6,000 euros.
ECHR ruling of June 14, 2018 in the case of Skripnikov and Others v. Russia (applications N 27365/06, 16153/11, 8684/12 and 38268/14).