The case was successfully considered a complaint about the length of the applicant's detention in custody, the excessive length of the procedure for appealing against the decision on remand, and the length of the proceedings that did not meet the requirements of reasonableness. The case has violated the requirements of paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 5 and paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2007, the complainant was assisted in preparing a аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the complainant, who lived before his arrest in Vladivostok, complained about the lengthy detention, the excessive length of the appeals procedure, and the length of the proceedings that did not meet the requirements of reasonableness.
On December 13, 2016, on the complaint filed by the applicant, the European Court unanimously ruled that in this case the authorities violated the requirements of paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 5 (right to liberty and security of person) and Article 6 (1) of the Convention (right to a fair trial) , and ordered the respondent state to pay him 3,100 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
ECHR ruling of December 13, 2016 on the case of Snyatovsky v. Russia (Snyatovskiy v. Russia) (аpplication No. 10341/07).