The case was successfully considered a complaint about the excessive length of the applicant's detention in custody, procedural violations during the judicial review of his complaints about the legality of the decisions on remand in custody. The case of violation of the requirements of paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2008, the complainant was assisted in preparing a аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the complainant, who lived before his arrest in the Rostov Region, complained about the excessive length of his detention, as well as procedural violations during the judicial review of his complaints about the legality of the decisions on remand in custody.
On December 13, 2016, on the complaint submitted by the applicant, the European Court unanimously ruled that in this case the authorities violated the requirements of Article 5 § 3 and 4 of the Convention (the right to liberty and security of person). The European Court ruled that there was a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention in respect of one of the two court hearings. The claimant did not submit claims for fair compensation.
ECHR ruling of December 13, 2016 in the case of Nazarov v. Russia (Nazarov v. Russia) (аpplication No. 17614/08).