The case was successfully considered the complaint of the applicant, who had a lifelong disability, about the lack of adequate quality medical care and inhuman conditions both in the place of detention and in the place where the sentence was served. The case did not violate the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in terms of the quality of medical care. The case has violated the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in relation to the conditions of the applicant's detention.
In 2010, the complainant was assisted in preparing a аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the applicant, who had a lifelong disability, complained about the failure to provide adequate medical care and inhuman conditions both at the place of detention and at the place where the sentence was served.
On March 7, 2017, on the complaint filed by the applicant, the European Court unanimously decided that in this case the authorities did not violate the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention (prohibition of torture) regarding the quality of medical care, by violating the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention regarding conditions of detention applicant in custody. The claimant did not submit claims for fair compensation.
ECHR ruling of March 7, 2017 on the case of Vinogradov (Vinogradov) v. Russia (аpplication N 27122/10).