The case was successfully considered a complaint about the non-execution of the court decision in favor of the applicant, a violation of property rights, the lack of effective domestic remedies. The case has violated the requirements of paragraph 1 of Article 6, Article 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2009, the applicant was assisted in the preparation of the аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In her complaint, the applicant, who lives in the city of Tambov, complained about the non-enforcement of the court decision, according to which the municipal unitary enterprise was obliged to pay her 348 euros. The applicant claimed that the failure to execute the decision resulted in a violation of the right to property and that she did not have effective domestic remedies in connection with the violations.
On 14 March 2017, on the complaint filed by the applicant, the European Court unanimously decided that in the present case the authorities violated the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (right to a fair trial), Article 13 of the Convention (the right to an effective domestic remedy) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (the right to property protection), and ordered the respondent State to pay the applicant 348 euros in respect of pecuniary damage and 2,000 euros in compensation for moral damages about harm.
ECHR ruling of March 14, 2017 in the case of Karpesh v. Russia (аpplication N 26920/09).