The case was successfully considered the complaint of the applicant to the non-execution of decisions of domestic courts, rendered in his favor, about the recovery of wage arrears from the state enterprise, as well as the lack of effective remedies in this regard. In the case of violations of paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
In 2006, the complainant was assisted in preparing a аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the complainant complained about the failure to execute the decisions of the domestic courts in his favor, about collecting wage arrears from the state enterprise, and about the lack of effective remedies in this regard.
On April 4, 2017, on the complaint filed by the applicant, the European Court unanimously ruled that in this case the authorities violated the requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (right to a fair trial), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (right to protection of property), and ordered the respondent Government to pay the applicant 2,121 euros in respect of pecuniary damage and 2,000 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
Resolution of the ECHR of April 4, 2017 in the case of Antoshkin v. Russia (аpplication N 46686/06).