In the case, complaints about cancellation of court decisions in favor of the applicants, due to incorrect application of the rules of substantive law or incorrect assessment of evidence by lower courts, were successfully examined. The case has violated the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2006 and 2007, complainants were assisted in preparing аpplications. Subsequently, the аpplications were merged and communicated to the Russian Federation.
In their complaints, the complainants (nine people) complained about the annulment of court decisions made in their favor following the consideration of cases in the first and appellate instances in civil proceedings, in the procedure of supervision by higher courts because of incorrect application of the rules of substantive law or incorrect assessment of evidence by lower courts.
On April 25, 2017, on the complaints lodged by the applicants, the European Court unanimously decided that in the present case the authorities violated the requirement of Article 6 of the Convention (the right to a fair trial) in respect of eight applicants, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (the right to property) in conjunction with Article 6 of the Convention in respect of one applicant, and ordered the respondent State to pay applicants 17,000 euros as a fair compensation. Applicants were awarded various amounts from 1,500 to 5,000 euros.
Resolution of the ECHR of April 25, 2017 in the case of Isayev and Others (Isayev and Others) v. Russia (аpplications No. 20707/06, 29518/06, 39006/06, 7527/07, 7678/07, 18756/07, 36533 / 07, 46727/07 and 55639/07).