The case was successfully considered the applicant's complaint about the failure to execute court decisions rendered in his favor, about collecting wage arrears from the municipal enterprise, as well as about the lack of effective remedies in connection with this circumstance. In the case of violations of paragraph 1 of Article 6 and Article 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
In 2013, the complainant was assisted in preparing a аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the applicant, who lives in Pechora, complained about the failure to execute court decisions in his favor, about collecting wage arrears from the municipal enterprise, as well as about the lack of effective remedies in connection with this circumstance.
On 2 May 2017, on a complaint filed by the applicant, the European Court unanimously decided that in the present case the authorities violated the requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (the right to a fair trial), Article 13 of the Convention (the right to an effective domestic remedy), articles 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (the right to property protection), and ordered the respondent State to pay the applicant 18,950 euros in respect of pecuniary damage and 1,623 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
ECHR ruling of May 02, 2017 in the case of Menshikov v. Russia (аpplication N 36888/13).