The case was successfully considered complaints of ill-treatment of the applicants by the police officers with a view to obtaining confessions, failure to conduct an effective investigation into the facts of ill-treatment of the applicants. The case has violated the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2009 and 2014, complainants were assisted in preparing аpplications. Subsequently, the аpplications were merged and communicated to the Russian Federation.
In their complaints, the complainants complained about the ill-treatment of the police officers with a view to extracting a confession and that no effective investigation had been conducted in this connection.
On May 2, 2017, on the complaints filed by the applicants, the European Court unanimously decided that in the present case the authorities violated the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention (prohibition of torture) in both its material and procedural aspects and that there is no need to consider a complaint of a violation 13 of the Convention (the right to an effective domestic remedy), obliging the respondent state to pay the first applicant 30,000 euros, the second 20,000 euros, and the third 45,000 euros as compensation for moral damages. harm.
Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights dated May 02, 2017 in the case of Olisov and Others v. Russia (аpplications no. 10825/09, 12412/14 and 35192/14).