The case was successfully considered a complaint about the abduction of the applicants, ill-treatment of them, the failure to conduct a proper investigation of these circumstances, the seizure of the applicants' property during the abduction. The case has violated the requirements of Articles 3, 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2010, complainants were assisted in preparing a аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In their complaint, the applicants (four people) complained that they had been abducted in 2006 in the city of Nazran and subjected to ill-treatment and that no proper investigation had been carried out into these circumstances. The applicants also complained that their property had been seized during their abduction.
On March 14, 2017, on the complaint filed by the applicants, the European Court unanimously ruled that in this case the authorities violated the requirements of articles 3 (prohibition of torture) in its substantive and procedural aspects, 5 of the Convention (right to liberty and security of person), article 1 Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (the right to protection of property), and ordered the respondent State to pay each applicant 19,500 euros for non-pecuniary damage. The first, second and fourth applicants were also awarded compensation for pecuniary damage in the amount of 1,610, 1,160, and 830 euros, respectively.
ECHR ruling of March 14, 2017 on the case of Orlov and Others (Russian Federation) (аpplication N 5632/10).