The case successfully considered the complaint of the applicant that his son died from wounds resulting from the use of weapons in the process of dispersing residents who had gathered for a public rally in 2006 in one of the villages of the Republic of Dagestan, and that in this respect an effective investigation was conducted. The case has violated the requirements of Article 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2008, the complainant was assisted in preparing a аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the complainant complained that his son had died from wounds resulting from the use of weapons in the process of dispersing residents who had gathered for a public rally in 2006 in a village in the Republic of Dagestan. The applicant also pointed out that no effective investigation had been carried out in this regard.
On March 30, 2017, on the complaint filed by the applicant, the European Court unanimously ruled that in the present case the authorities violated the requirements of Article 2 of the Convention (the right to life) in its substantive and procedural aspects, and by 14 votes against three ordered the respondent State to pay the applicant 50,000 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
The joint concurring opinion was expressed by judges A. Nussberger (elected from Germany) and P. Lemmens (elected from Belgium), the joint dissenting opinion was expressed by judges G. Raimondi (elected from Italy), S. O'Leary (elected from Ireland) and K. Ranzoni (elected from Liechtenstein).
Resolution of the ECHR of March 30, 2017 in the case of "Nagmetov (Nagmetov) v. The Russian Federation" (аpplication N 35589/08).