The case was successfully considered a complaint about the applicant's unlawful deprivation of liberty, his detention in inhuman conditions, his failure to provide medical assistance, and unfair trial. The case involved violation of the requirements of Article 3, paragraph 1 of Article 5, paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2007, the applicant was assisted in preparing the аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the applicant complained that he had been unlawfully deprived of his liberty by the authorities of the Moldavian Transdniestrian Republic in 2005, was detained in inhuman conditions and that he was not provided with medical care, and the trial against him was not fair.
On 30 May 2017, on a complaint lodged by the applicant, the European Court held by six votes in favor, one against, that in this case the authorities of the Republic of Moldova did not violate any provisions of the Convention, and the Government violated the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention prohibition of torture), article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention (right to liberty and security of the person), article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention (right to a fair trial), and obliged the Russian authorities to pay the applicant 40,000 euros in compensation for moral damage Yes.
Judge D. Dedov (elected from the Russian Federation) expressed a special dissenting opinion on this case.
ECHR Ordinance of 30 May 2017 in the case of Apkov v. Republic of Moldova and the Russian Federation (аpplication No. 13463/07).