The ECHR found a violation of the requirement of paragraph 1 and subparagraph "c" of paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Заголовок: The ECHR found a violation of the requirement of paragraph 1 and subparagraph "c" of paragraph 3 o Сведения: 2018-09-02 11:43:36

In the case, the applicant successfully complained that the lawyers had failed to perform their duties in an efficient manner, and that the trial in the appellate instance was not fair, since the applicant could not communicate with the lawyer in person, but only through the video communication system. The case involved violations of the requirements of paragraph 1 and subparagraph (c) of paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

In 2006, the applicant was assisted in the preparation of the аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.

In his complaint, the applicant complained that the lawyers on assignment had performed their duties ineffectively, and also that the trial in the appellate instance was not fair, since the applicant could not communicate with the lawyer in person, but only through the video communication system.

On 27 June 2017, on a complaint lodged by the applicant, the Court unanimously held that in this case the Government violated the requirement of paragraph 1 and subparagraph (c) of paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Convention (the right to a fair trial), obliging the respondent State to pay the applicant 4,000 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.

The ECHR judgment of 27 June 2017 in the case of Medvedev (Medvedev) v. Russian Federation (аpplication No. 5217/06).

 

Добавить комментарий

Защитный код
Обновить

© 2011-2018 Юридическая помощь в составлении жалоб в Европейский суд по правам человека. Юрист (представитель) ЕСПЧ.