The ECHR judgment of July 9, 2019 in the case of Kislov v. Russia (application No. 3598/10).
The case has successfully examined the application that the applicant would be at risk of ill-treatment if he is extradited to Belarus, as he was sentenced to imprisonment in Belarus as a result of a trial that was a flagrant denial of justice, and he also complained about the lack of effective domestic legal remedies. protection in this regard, and detention in the Russian Federation was unlawful. There was a violation of the requirements of paragraphs 1, 4 and 5 of Article 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2010, the applicant was assisted in preparing the application. Subsequently, the application was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his application, the applicant complained that he would be at risk of ill-treatment if he was extradited to Belarus, as he was sentenced to imprisonment in Belarus as a result of a trial which constituted a flagrant denial of justice. He also argued that there were no effective domestic remedies in this regard and that his detention in the Russian Federation was unlawful.
On July 9, 2019, on an application lodged by the applicant, the Court unanimously ruled that in the present case the Government violated the requirements of Article 5 §§ 1, 4 and 5 of the Convention (right to liberty and security of person) and ordered the respondent Government to pay the applicant 10,000 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.