The case was successfully considered a complaint about the inhuman conditions of detention in a special temporary detention facility for foreign citizens, as well as the fact that the Russian authorities had unfairly conducted an expulsion case to Tajikistan. The case has violated the requirements of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2017, the complainant was assisted in preparing an application. Subsequently, the application was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the complainant complained about the inhuman conditions of detention in a special temporary detention center for foreign nationals (SUVSIG), and also that the Russian authorities had unfairly conducted the expulsion proceedings in Tajikistan, because of the circumstances of the case they knew that his expulsion It was not possible due to the lack of clarity about the citizenship of Tajikistan.
On 15 May 2018, the European Court unanimously ruled that in the present case the authorities of the Russian Federation did not violate the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention (prohibition of torture), but violated the requirements of paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Convention (the right to liberty and personal inviolability), and ordered the respondent Government to pay the applicant 7,500 euros in compensation.
ECHR judgment of May 15, 2018 in the case of Mainov v. Russian Federation (application No. 11556/17).