The case has successfully examined the applicants' complaints about the excessive length of their pre-trial detention, as well as the fact that the judicial review of the reasonableness of his detention did not meet the urgency criterion. The case of violation of the requirements of paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2014, complainants were assisted in preparing аpplications. Subsequently, the аpplications were merged and communicated to the Russian Federation.
In their complaints, the applicants (six people) complained about the excessive length of their detention pending trial. One applicant also complained that a judicial review of the validity of his detention did not meet the urgency criterion. In one case, due to the death of the applicant, the European Court allowed him to continue to represent his interests to family members (widow and son).
On February 2, 2017 on the complaints lodged by the applicants, the European Court unanimously decided that in the present case the authorities violated the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (the right to liberty and security of person) in relation to all applicants and Clause 4 of the Convention in respect of one of them, and ordered the respondent State to pay the applicants 14,300 euros in respect of pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage and court costs. The applicants were awarded various amounts from 1,000 to 2,700 euros.
ECHR ruling of February 02, 2017 in the case of Dzhabarov and Others (Dzhabarov and Others) v. Russia (аpplications N 51182/10, 62814/10, 34313/11, 10342/12, 32166/14 and 59613/14).