The case was successfully considered complaints of non-execution and excessive length in the execution of judicial acts issued in favor of the applicants, the respondents for which were state or municipal unitary enterprises, the lack of effective remedies. The case has violated the requirements of paragraph 1 of Article 6, Article 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2009, 2010 and 2011, complainants were assisted in preparing аpplications. Subsequently, the аpplications were merged and communicated to the Russian Federation.
In their complaints, the complainants complained about the non-enforcement or excessive length of time in the execution of court decisions in their favor, the respondent for which were state or municipal unitary enterprises. The applicants also claimed that they did not have effective remedies in respect of the said allegations.
On 16 February 2017, in the complaints filed by the applicants, the European Court unanimously ruled that in the present case the authorities violated the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (the right to a fair trial), Article 13 of the Convention (the right to an effective domestic remedy) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (the right to protection of property), and ordered the respondent State to pay the applicants a total of 202,531 euros in compensation for pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage and judicial remedies gatherings. The applicants were awarded various amounts from € 6,315 to € 96,636.
Resolution of the ECHR of February 16, 2017 in the case of Mamedov and Others (Mamedov and Others) v. Russia (аpplications N 16264/09, 54547/10, 60362/10, 75556/10, 1990/11, 12511/11).