The case was successfully considered a complaint of ill-treatment of the complainant by police officers with a view to obtaining confessions, failure to conduct an effective investigation into the ill-treatment of the complainant. The case has violated the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In 2010, the complainant was assisted in preparing a аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the complainant complained of ill-treatment by officers of the internal affairs bodies in order to extract a confession and that no effective investigation had been carried out in this connection.
On May 2, 2017, on the complaint filed by the applicant, the European Court unanimously ruled that in the present case the authorities violated the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention (prohibition of torture) in both its material and procedural aspects and that there is no need to consider a complaint of a violation of article 13 of the Convention (the right to an effective domestic remedy), obliging the respondent State to pay the applicant 20,000 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
Resolution of the ECHR of May 02, 2017 in the case of Kondakov (v. Russian Federation) (аpplication no. 31632/10).