In the case, the applicant successfully complained that the judgment rendered in his favor had not been enforced within a reasonable time and that the authorities had failed to protect his house from the annual flooding of melt and groundwater that had occurred after the repair of the roadway passing in the immediate vicinity of the applicant's house. The case violated the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
In 2013, the applicant was assisted in preparing the аpplication. Subsequently, the аpplication was communicated to the Russian Federation.
In his complaint, the applicant, who lived in Izhevsk, complained that the judgment in his favor had not been enforced within a reasonable time and that the authorities had failed to protect his house from the annual flooding of melt and groundwater that had begun to occur After the repair of the roadway passing in the immediate vicinity of the applicant's house.
On 27 June 2017, on a complaint lodged by the applicant, the Court unanimously held that in the present case the Government violated the requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (the right to a fair trial), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (right to property protection) , and ordered the respondent State to pay the applicant 1,950 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
The ECHR judgment of 27 June 2017 in the case of Bigashev v. The Russian Federation (аpplication No. 71444/13).